When embarking on Agile, many teams start with Scrum. Sooner or later, they inquire about XP. Is there one 'right' way of implementing Scrum and XP? Do you 'have' to do both?
This article by James Shore does a great job of summing it up. He says "Scrum is easier and less threatening than XP, so I see a lot more people starting out with Scrum. On the downside, the teams that start with Scrum tend to struggle more than the teams that start with XP. The XP teams experience more pain starting out, but then get to a high performance state within the first year."
As Agile evolves, and as Lean Startup enters the picture, I am sure of only one thing, that people will continue to debate this topic.
For me, I can say that I have seen successes both small and large when a team implements either one of Scrum or XP, and also success when they implement both. It's not so much that you go through the motions, but rather that you understand why you are going through them and make them meaningful for your team.
It's the third week in a row that your team has given the same update: "We are almost done with the 'previous orders' feature." You are frustrated with the lack of progress and the inability to shift to more important work—like that feature you wish the ... read more
Josh Seiden, the fourth speaker in Stride's Leadership through adversity speaker series, spoke about the value of focusing on outcomes, defined as: "measurable changes in behavior that drive business results." read more
To start his talk, psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Dr. Kerry Sulkowicz admitted to being at a bit of a loss when asked about best practices for leading through a pandemic. "The honest answer is I don't know," he stated, "because none of us has lived ... read more
Taking direct aim at the narrative of the "all in" entrepreneur who takes extreme risks and depletes their bank account before ultimately succeeding, noted NYC VC Charlie O'Donnell started his Stride Consulting “Leading through Adversity” talk on May ... read more